4 ms·
In which world are technical features like "how many channels the format supports" or "maximum bit depth" or "progressive decoding" opinions, exactly?
by vanderZwan 3y ago
In which world are technical features like "how many channels the format supports" or "maximum bit depth" or "progressive decoding" opinions, exactly?
- jdiff 3y agoYou can pick and choose which facts to present or misrepresent which/what is important but... that's not going on here. JXL is actually just better by very many metrics. It's only lacking in adoption. There's not something that jpeg-xl.info is ignoring or glossing over. This is just lazy cynicism.
- iLoveOncall 3y agoI was mostly joking, but you can compare a skateboard and a car and make the skateboard look better if you just mention weight and pollution but not top speed, autonomy, etc.
- vanderZwan 3y agoWell, ok, that's a fair point: from this table alone you can't say anything about computational complexity or implementation difficulty. And I cannot honestly say anything about that. I agree that it's a valid question to ask. I'm afraid that your first reply misfired a bit if that was what you wanted to get across though.