3 ms·
I think if you significantly benefitted from ChatGPT in preparing the paper, then you should still cite it, just like you would cite a software package (e.g. sc
by falcor84 3y ago
I think if you significantly benefitted from ChatGPT in preparing the paper, then you should still cite it, just like you would cite a software package (e.g. scipy), even if in principle you could have done it by hand.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Wowfunhappy 3y agoI didn't know that was standard, but where is the line? You would never cite e.g. Microsoft Word, right? Coincidently, that will soon have ChatGPT built-in.
- falcor84 3y agoAPA for example says the following: "... a reference is not necessary for standard software... Examples are Microsoft Word, Java, and Adobe Photoshop." https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-software-in-apa-style.html https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-softw...