3 ms·
In that case, there's no reason to cite ChatGPT at all, just as you wouldn't cite Google. Cite the actual references, which you manually checked.
by Wowfunhappy 3y ago
In that case, there's no reason to cite ChatGPT at all, just as you wouldn't cite Google. Cite the actual references, which you manually checked.
- falcor84 3y agoI think if you significantly benefitted from ChatGPT in preparing the paper, then you should still cite it, just like you would cite a software package (e.g. scipy), even if in principle you could have done it by hand.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Wowfunhappy 3y agoI didn't know that was standard, but where is the line? You would never cite e.g. Microsoft Word, right? Coincidently, that will soon have ChatGPT built-in.
- falcor84 3y agoAPA for example says the following: "... a reference is not necessary for standard software... Examples are Microsoft Word, Java, and Adobe Photoshop." https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-software-in-apa-style.html https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-softw...