3 ms·
> Which might be ok for the surrounding land, but isn't fine for the inhabitants of the city. Even when the "surrounding land" is a 15-20 minute bicycle ride a
by throw0101b 3y ago
> Which might be ok for the surrounding land, but isn't fine for the inhabitants of the city.
Even when the "surrounding land" is a 15-20 minute bicycle ride away, or a hoping on a train to smaller a little farther away (or perhaps have train stations at Nature preserves)?
Or perhaps green spaces like New York's Central Park or Toronto's Leslie Street Spit:
* https://tommythompsonpark.ca/about/ https://tommythompsonpark.ca/about/
* https://www.google.com/search?as_q=Leslie+Street+Spit&as_st=y&tbm=isch https://www.google.com/search?as_q=Leslie+Street+Spit&as_st=...
regularly interspersed between housing. Toronto used to have a number of rivers/ravines that got filled in for housing:
* https://www.blogto.com/city/2014/02/5_lost_rivers_that_run_under_toronto/ https://www.blogto.com/city/2014/02/5_lost_rivers_that_run_u...
* https://www.lostrivers.ca https://www.lostrivers.ca
- c00lio 3y agoTotally insufficient. People need a green outlook out of their windows, surrounding greenery is linked to various kinds of psychological goodness. Having to commute to an overcrowded, dirty, needle-ridden park or outskirt somewhere isn't an option. And for wildlife, continuous bands of greenery and routes of migration with only small interruptions (like street crossings) are necessary. Isolated islands are almost useless.