It’s a funny idea, but the critiques are not even that good. This one [1] has absolutely no argument to make and just continuously mocks the lack of technical

It’s a funny idea, but the critiques are not even that good. This one [1] has absolutely no argument to make and just continuously mocks the lack of technical knowledge by the author and “lack of sources” - it’s an opinion piece... I was hoping to see more down to earth solid arguments on why AI will not lead to “increasingly powerful and invisible surveillance / weapons” etc, rather than a linguistic takedown. [1] https://criticalai.org/2022/10/03/emily-m-bender-on-stephen-marches-of-god-and-machines-in-the-atlantic-9-15-2022/ https://criticalai.org/2022/10/03/emily-m-bender-on-stephen-...