3 ms·
Sure, the point of my article is to build upon the Reuters article to provide some concrete domains/archives links, add new sites to the existing Reuters list,
by cirosantilli 3y ago
Sure, the point of my article is to build upon the Reuters article to provide some concrete domains/archives links, add new sites to the existing Reuters list, and explain the technical details used to obtain them.
With a bit of reverse engineering, I'm sure we'd be able to get a mockup of the JavaScript ones running however: https://cirosantilli.com/cia-2010-covert-communication-websites#javascript-reverse-engineering https://cirosantilli.com/cia-2010-covert-communication-websi... But in the end, it's just going to be some kind of "click something, a box opens, you type, it encrypts and sends a POST request.".
The main interest of reverse engineering to me would be to possibly find some searchable fingerprint that we could use to find more of the websites.
- jaclaz 3y agoSide question (irrelevant, just as curiosity), why did you write it in third person? I see that later on you switch to "we". JFYI, there are a couple typos I could spot, "pubic" and "lits".
- cirosantilli 3y agoHi, third person: https://cirosantilli.com/why-ciro-santilli-refers-to-himself-in-the-third-person https://cirosantilli.com/why-ciro-santilli-refers-to-himself... We includes me, and if at some point others might contribute. So when it's not something I did specifically, I tend to we. Typos: fixed now and some others, thanks. Feel free to send any others. "Pubic" one was epic. Vim sometimes forgets to turn on spellcheck.
- jaclaz 3y agoYep, the "pubic" one is a classic.