3 ms·
This isn't even true in it's face. The lingua franca the term is derived from was a trading language across different cultures. It was used across the Mediterr
by enkid 3y ago
This isn't even true in it's face. The lingua franca the term is derived from was a trading language across different cultures. It was used across the Mediterranean when there was a common language due to geopolitical or religious barriers. The need for such a language has only increased with increased global connectivity and global commerce. This is the same role it's filing in places like the EU, where only a small population speaks it natively, but it's a working language of the central bank and and the European Commission. In India and South Africa, it's lack of a native population has actually helped it maintain it's status, as other potential languages of commerce/government (for example Hindi in India and Afrikaans in SA) are associated negatively with nationalistic political movements for a majority of the population. Even in a country like Vietnam, where you would think a negative history with the United States would discourage it's use, over 50% of its population has some use of it. Overall, I just think it's hard to see any sort of trend of English lessening as a lingua franca.
- midasuni 3y agoIt’s possible increasingly accurate and usable real time translation removing the need for a common tongue over the next 20 years, let alone 100
- throw0101b 3y ago> The lingua franca the term is derived from was a trading language across different cultures. Which is the first 80-90% of the book: the history of various ones going back about to 3000 BC (or some such).