5 ms·
You won't and that is the point. A population without social cohesion is easily governed.
by sprash 3y ago
You won't and that is the point. A population without social cohesion is easily governed.
- twixfel 3y agoThat's not true at all. Germany is easily governed already.
- sprash 3y agoIndeed. The social cohesion in Germany was bad to begin with. This is what happens when you are occupied territory for more than 70 years. But mass immigration destroys the last glimmer of hope for self governance.
- twixfel 3y agoNone of that makes any sense. Having Western military bases in Germany harms social cohesion? What? Social cohesion in Germany is high anyway. Nothing you say makes any sense, the conclusions and reasoning are both wrong. You're not a serious person. Also people like you normally argue that more immigrants means more disorder, so I am really not convinced your stance is even remotely coherent.
- sprash 3y agoOccupying forces are in control of the state media obviously. But since their influence on people blow 70 years of age is going to zero fast more migrants are needed. And having experienced mass migration first hand I can assure you: more immigrants means more disorder, more violence, more cost for social net, less quality of life and lower wages across the board. My experience with migrants is 100% universally bad. And I'm absolutely serious about that.
- twixfel 3y agoAh yes, obviously, of course. > more immigrants means more disorder, more violence, more cost for social net, Strange, you literally just insisted immigration would make Germany easier to govern. Difficult to take you seriously.
- inglor_cz 3y agoLooking at France, with its assortment of violent movements and protests and ever growing ethnic plurality ... your theory seems to have some flaws.
- sprash 3y agoObviously not. Thanks to "plurality" people are occupied with fighting each other instead for themselves against rulers that repeatedly act against their interests.