4 ms·
>>> management of it deciding to push it in direction different than community wishes THAT is a fundamental and interesting (almost philosophical) question: sh
by olivierduval 3y ago
>>> management of it deciding to push it in direction different than community wishes
THAT is a fundamental and interesting (almost philosophical) question: should a forum/website/media FOLLOW "community wishes" (democracy-style) or FOLLOW a vision even without traction (benevolent or bureaucratic dictatorship style) ???
BOTH are good AND bad in a way or another...
* FOLLOWING COMMUNITY WISHES will ensure more and more people, but lower average quality (bazaar style) because everybody will talk about what interest him in the end... so hard to keep a focus. Moreover, community wishes is prone to forum "take over" by subgroups (think for example "extreme right" - for whatever that means, or hackers, or...)
* CHARTER will ensure that a forum has a single "topic" (even a niche) but the community won't grow as much, it need strong moderation, people will regularily clash/disagree and leave about the rules... but quality will be higher (more focused and specialized)
- ilyt 3y agoFrankly I think people having a little bit of fight in the comments isn't even something moderators should bother with, HN/reddit like format of conversation makes it easy enough to avoid (it was worse for forums when that derailed whole thread) and it mostly gets downvoted to the bottom anyway. But there needs to be some push for a certain direction for the social space. Just maybe not "dictator for life" as is on pretty much every subreddit. I wonder if some kind of elected "democracy", with people voting having their vote weight tweaked by "contribution level" to the community. Still probably prone to some biases but at the very least not in the "lowest common denominator" direction.