3 ms·
> No tuples: I found this to trade some convinience (no need to name anything)for worse refactoring (adding a value to a tuple or reordering the fields breaks e
by scns 3y ago
> No tuples: I found this to trade some convinience (no need to name anything)for worse refactoring (adding a value to a tuple or reordering the fields breaks everything, doing the same to a record doesn’t).
Did you mean better refactoring?
- christophilus 3y agoHe means the tuple feature is convenient but makes refactoring harder than if you instead used a record.