> the group was surveilled because they were known to have fought in syria That's not correct. One person fought against Daech in Syria, then a few years later

> the group was surveilled because they were known to have fought in syria That's not correct. One person fought against Daech in Syria, then a few years later a dozen persons get arrested ; most of them don't know one another. You can't really talk about a "group" and certainly can't say they took arms when only one of them did (and for an arguably very good cause which was approved by the State on paper). I agree with you the video title is misleading, though.