2 ms·
> 3) Distribute output widely, note that copyright still applies to the output. Can you elaborate on this point? I don't think this has been established to be
by pcthrowaway 3y ago
> 3) Distribute output widely, note that copyright still applies to the output.
Can you elaborate on this point? I don't think this has been established to be the case yet.
- yyyk 3y agoLet's adopt a legal realist point of view. RIAA/etc. have money, lots of lawyers with large briefcases, and lobbyists so as to basically write the law. The ordinary YouTuber doesn't have tohe resources to defend, and there aren't any commercial interests on the other side here. So even if the output is technically made entirely by LLM, they'd find a way to slightly tweak the process or even the law so it applies. Someone will do a trivial low-pass filter and then claim copyright. At worst they'd find a flunky to say they 'wrote' the music.
- ben_w 3y agoThey might; but equally, Meta or Apple might counter-lobby to end copyright as a concept entirely, (or just for music, depending on how good the LLMs are at code and script writing for commissioned TV shows and stuff). Those two can still rely on patents and trade secrets in a way that RIAA can't. (At least, the RIAA can't rely on those as far as I can see, but what do I know…)