7 ms·
That article says the first thing you said but not the second.
by th0ma5 3y ago
That article says the first thing you said but not the second.
- xcv123 3y ago[flagged]
- th0ma5 3y ago[flagged]
- xcv123 3y ago[flagged]
- th0ma5 3y ago[flagged]
- xcv123 3y agoNo it is not an ad hominem attack to say that your argument is childish and stupid. You're not even having a debate. You're just spamming the forum with drivel.
- th0ma5 3y agoI am trying to say that either it leaked or it didn't, but that we'll never know, but that it doesn't matter anyway.
- prepend 3y agoWe will know, eventually, hopefully. I think it really matters. To better prevent future pandemics and to establish frameworks for restitution. And it definitely matters for future economic reparations. If negligence is the cause of a multi-million death, multi-trillion dollar response it needs to be corrected to prevent future similar errors.
- totallychinese 3y agoThe linked article is from 2004. It clearly says nothing re: point 2.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xcv123 3y agoSo what? You missed the point or are pretending to ignore it. Another CCP troll.