> Witnesses are said to have told the US investigation that Zhou fell from the roof of the Wuhan institute, although this has not been verified. This guy who p

> Witnesses are said to have told the US investigation that Zhou fell from the roof of the Wuhan institute, although this has not been verified. This guy who published a suspiciously early patent on a covid 19 vaccine fell off a roof three months later? That’s kind of buried in the article a bit but was this claim been made anywhere else? Also, the section on activity at the lab at the time of the outbreak does not mention analysis of private app data. IIRC, one of the early discredited reports suggesting lab origin had relied, in-part, on commercially available app data. The kind of adware built into “free” apps that violate user privacy. This data supposedly showed clear activity supporting a temporary shutdown of the Wuhan lab. This information always seemed the easiest to latch on to. Not to prove origin but at least offer an important fact for a pattern. US military bases have had their locations and perimeters out on the public web thanks to fitness apps. Was the WIV associated app data not real? If it was, why isn’t it included in this article? The article relates a study “by academics at Wuhan University located the hotspots in Wuhan where people were reporting on social media that they needed treatment for Covid.” How would this be more compelling than raw app data showing movement of employees or security workers in and around WIV?