3 ms·
As far as libc, I should have clarified that I meant linking with musl libc, which can in fact be linked in statically, unlike glibc. So that part is not a prob
by schemescape 3y ago
As far as libc, I should have clarified that I meant linking with musl libc, which can in fact be linked in statically, unlike glibc. So that part is not a problem for me.
As for the FASL compilation part, it sounds like I did indeed misunderstand the documentation, but I’ll need to digest your comment a bit more :)
Thanks!
- jackdaniel 3y agoI think that you'd need to tinker a little with ECL makefile to adjust flags in order to enable static linking. That said ECL does work with musl libc, so at least from the porting perspective there should not be any problem. If you manage to link musl libc statically then I'd greatly appreciate if you share your experience on our issue tracker or on irc (#ecl @ libera.chat), and if you have problems with it, you may ask in either for advice.