4 ms·
I have written patches for countless applications I use. I'm not denying GitHub is good or valuable, but luckily we live in a world of gray areas and nuance. I
by predictabl3 3y ago
I have written patches for countless applications I use. I'm not denying GitHub is good or valuable, but luckily we live in a world of gray areas and nuance.
I'm getting a bit frustrated. The proposition is really, despite how everyone wants to twist it, quite simple. I spend my life on OSS, I haven't had a paycheck in 5+ years. I'm sick and tired of pouring my expertise and knowledge and investment into platforms that I can't fix. I use closed-source firmware, and that's it. My "unfree" predicates for my NixOS machines contain nothing. That's by design after 25+ years of using computers and applying the same philosophy. I build software and adopt software for the long-term, and every time I break my "okay, this time" rule, I get burned. Case in point, the GitHub issues *that don't exist anymore because GH memory-holed them*
And yes, I spent less time moving my shit to sourcehut and getting CI going there than I did spending additional days working around GitHub. Obviously this isn't feasible for a large project overnight, but responsible projects are absolutely entertaining conversations about it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- scrollaway 3y agoPower to you. I respect your stance, but as you said we live in a world of nuance, and this absolutism is incompatible with how the world works. It can work /for you/, in a vacuum, because you can selectively accept the tradeoffs. It also used to work for me! I've been in tech long enough to have been through what you're doing, and I have stopped doing it because at some point, it crippled my ability to effect change on the world. And I'm not interested in living in my bubble of free software a la Stallman. I'm interested in making the bubble larger. I can't do this from inside the bubble. (Email me if you want to continue this convo and chat a bit, I'd be interested)