4 ms·
"The Wizard and the Prophet" is a very good read in that respect. It's about the contrasting views and results of these two scientists: https://en.wikipedia.or
by photochemsyn 3y ago
"The Wizard and the Prophet" is a very good read in that respect. It's about the contrasting views and results of these two scientists:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Vogt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Vogt
> "According to Charles C. Mann, "Vogt...laid out the basic ideas for the modern environmental movement. In particular, he founded what the Hampshire College population researcher Betsy Hartmann has called 'apocalyptic environmentalism'—the belief that unless humankind drastically reduces consumption and limits population, it will ravage global ecosystems."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug
> "...an American agronomist who led initiatives worldwide that contributed to the extensive increases in agricultural production termed the Green Revolution. Borlaug was awarded multiple honors for his work, including the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Congressional Gold Medal."
Was one right, and the other wrong? Or perhaps there is a broader understanding, one that can incorporate both viewpoints.
- NoMoreNicksLeft 3y agoEnvironmental alarmists might not always be wrong, but they have been so far. I don't know why they hate their own species and wish to see it extinct, but then I am not a psychiatrist. Do you want the Star Trek future we've all dreamed about since we were kids? People like Borlaug will get us there if anyone can. They deserve your attention, not the likes of Vogt and Erlich and the others. The idea that somehow the maximum population of humans should be limited to single digit billions or even hundreds of millions should be disgusting to reasonable people.