3 ms·
Yet another submission where WHIP & the WebRTC are conflated. This is due using http to stream video to another service which can actually do WebRTC. Still exc
by rektide 3y ago
Yet another submission where WHIP & the WebRTC are conflated. This is due using http to stream video to another service which can actually do WebRTC.
Still excellent still a huge win, but also a pretty big distion. Users still need considerably more to actually get online.
Same conflation happened for ffmpeg getting WHIP. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36130191 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36130191
- Sean-Der 3y agoSorry I might be confused, but `This is due using http to stream video to another service which can actually do WebRTC` I don’t think is right. WHIP is WebRTC signaling only. It just standardizes using a HTTP POST to exchange Offer/Answer. No media flows over HTTP.