3 ms·
I’d say “raw” is light imprinted on film. I may be biased but wouldn’t mind seeing 35mm make a comeback.
by dclowd9901 3y ago
I’d say “raw” is light imprinted on film. I may be biased but wouldn’t mind seeing 35mm make a comeback.
- dylan604 3y agothat's not what "raw" means though, and this is a really weird interpretation
- lm28469 3y ago> I may be biased but wouldn’t mind seeing 35mm make a comeback. It's on the rise for the past years
- ForestCritter 3y agoYes, me too. I have a Minolta Rangefinder in a box that needs the crank spring fixed. I've kept it because it captures the lighting exactly like I see it with my eyes. I would get the best night/ twighlight/ evening pictures with it and I would specify no color correction at the developer. I don't think digital photographers understand what it is to capture the light'. I have a newer Minolta in working condition that also takes excellent quality pictures.