3 ms·
This is unimportant - and they are doing it for attribution reasons. But it is irony of the ironies for Nature which sources all its content AND revisions from
by seydor 3y ago
This is unimportant - and they are doing it for attribution reasons.
But it is irony of the ironies for Nature which sources all its content AND revisions from the open community to say they care about fair copyright compensation of creators.
- HPMOR 3y agoOf course they care about copy right! It is their whole business model after all!! Scihub is “bad” because “copyright” ergo generative AI is “bad” because copyright.
- seydor 3y agoHold on, so you are sayign that because GenAI is using open content it can't be copyrighted properly? Hmm, i wonder who else is using publicly-funded content and editors ... And by the way things like adobe's genAI are definitely using licenced content but nature doesnt even allow that Aren't they unlegitimizing their own business model by claiming such things?