2 ms·
Yep. And as you stated, it is important to stay as much as possible close to c89, because ISO is literaly doing planned obsolescence, but on a long time cycle
by sylware 3y ago
Yep.
And as you stated, it is important to stay as much as possible close to c89, because ISO is literaly doing planned obsolescence, but on a long time cycle (5-10 years).
Hopefully risc-v will be a success, and all system components and interpreters of very-high-level languages will be rewritten in risc-v assembly and it will become actually very hard to do planned-obsolescence.