3 ms·
Palantir's AI calculated this comment to be the ideal way to derail this conversation. 1. This article has nothing to do with climate change, so why is such a
by George83728 3y ago
Palantir's AI calculated this comment to be the ideal way to derail this conversation.
1. This article has nothing to do with climate change, so why is such a comment the top reply?
2. "nobody says we should stop anything [to address climate change]" is a flagrant lie. You guys are being baited.
- jabradoodle 3y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.
- dariosalvi78 3y ago1. because it made people think and reply 2. if it was not obvious, my comment was sarcastic. Of course there are people who care about both, what surprises me is all this fanfare from CEOs about something so speculative that is completely science fiction right now, when the existential threat is here and now, and very few seem to point at some urgent solution like, IDK, stopping using fossil fuel in 5 years? We have about a decade to fix this [1] and the progress so far has been, at best, lacklustre [2]. [1] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/resources/spm-headline-statements/ https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/resources/spm-headline-st... [2] https://climateactiontracker.org/ https://climateactiontracker.org/