5 ms·
Have you been to New York? The subway is the mode of transportation for nearly everyone and it works great. I wouldn’t say cars are the successful mode of trans
by elijaht 3y ago
Have you been to New York? The subway is the mode of transportation for nearly everyone and it works great. I wouldn’t say cars are the successful mode of transportation in New York at all
- shrubble 3y agoIn terms of paying enough taxes to sustain further use, is how I should have phrased it. Why can't the subway fund its own improvements?
- zip1234 3y agoRoad user fees don't even cover half of the cost of roads let alone make up for all the negative externalities.
- dotnet00 3y agoIf we're complaining about the costs of negative externalities, are we also considering the value of the positive externalities?
- zip1234 3y agoThe benefits are why people would pay the price of the negative externalities. If not deemed to be worthwhile, there are other means of transportation that have less negative externalities.
- dotnet00 3y agoDescribing the NYC subway as "working great" is an amazing twisting of the truth. The only thing good about it is that it isn't as bad as public transport in Long Island. Otherwise, good luck going anywhere on time without having to add 30 minutes - an hour of waste just standing around. The discomfort and cost of public transportation would be at least somewhat tolerable if there was anywhere near as much of an emphasis on timeliness as there is in, say, Japan. As it stands though, the public transport is the one thing I miss least and hate most about the city.
- ricktdotorg 3y ago> Describing the NYC subway as "working great" is an amazing twisting of the truth. The only thing good about it is that it isn't as bad as public transport in Long Island. Otherwise, good luck going anywhere on time without having to add 30 minutes - an hour of waste just standing around. just to add some real numbers, we can look at the actual NYC subway data from MTA's march 2023 report[0] page 12: * ~3.7m subway riders in march 2023 * 84.7% of riders arrived at their destinations within 5min of schedule * 83.3% weekday on-time performance * 85.6% weekend on-time performance [0] https://new.mta.info/document/109346 https://new.mta.info/document/109346
- tick_tock_tick 3y agoGive me p90, p95, etc. While less frequent those are the events people remember not the other 3 days it worked.
- estebank 3y agoLet's say you travel every week day once on each direction (480 trips). The average person will be off their expected arrival time by more than 5 minutes on 72 trips. Of those 72, how many are over, let's say, half an hour? In Buenos Aires I could say that those kind of delays are something that I would experience maybe 12 times a year. They happen, they stand out, they are annoying, but I've also been stuck in traffic for that long, about as often.
- dotnet00 3y agoI highly doubt the accuracy of that, the ~one time per month during weekends that I have to travel to the city, the subway and busses were so unreliable with timing that it's easier to just take the LIRR to the nearest place to my destination, ignore the busses and walk the remaining miles.
- ars 3y agoThis all might be true - but despite that, it takes half an hour to drive to the airport, and an hour and a half by subway + train. And for family groups the public transport is more expensive, even when including parking (or paying an Uber).