3 ms·
I used to think that V2X road infrastructure was a major necessary component for self driving. I no longer hold that opinion. The “self-driving” infrastructure
by zaroth 3y ago
I used to think that V2X road infrastructure was a major necessary component for self driving. I no longer hold that opinion.
The “self-driving” infrastructure would not be magically any better than the “human-driving” infrastructure, and how to handle conflicting data from the infra in terms of sensor fusion is not at all clear.
In short, it creates as many problems as it solves, and doesn’t really solve the problems that it sets out to in the real-world.
Even simpler things like supplemental signaling that could be used in special circumstances like road work and emergency vehicles, if they are not used properly and consistently in all cases, it doesn’t change the fact that the system needs to correctly handle these cases internally.
- lvl102 3y agoI definitely agree state of the art is good enough for 97% of driving scenarios but they’re also not fail-safe and robust. In order for autonomous to be truly acceptable, they need to be 100x more safe. No, nearly flawless. In order to accomplish that you need physical and hardcoded methods as well. In addition, and equally as important, is that road infrastructure gives you improved ability to coordinate cars on the road without relying on individual and disparate compute units.