4 ms·
I appreciate your contribution but I disagree that it’s any more “meta” to respond to the community’s unwritten reactions (votes) than responding to its written
by simondotau 3y ago
I appreciate your contribution but I disagree that it’s any more “meta” to respond to the community’s unwritten reactions (votes) than responding to its written reactions (normal replies).
- dmbche 3y agoOh I was refering to your comment on the editorialisation of the title, since it's not a comment on the subject of the article but on the writing of it's title. Not a dig, just an observation.
- simondotau 3y agoOh, I misunderstood. Still, I’d argue that in a world where most people who eyeball the headline don’t read the article, the headline is the story. And thus discussing whether the headline leaves a misleading impression is fair game — and not at all meta.