3 ms·
We need a name for the place people go when they "opt out". A positive and defined "somewhere" instead of a negation and a landscape with a random collection of
by nologic01 3y ago
We need a name for the place people go when they "opt out". A positive and defined "somewhere" instead of a negation and a landscape with a random collection of hacks.
Getting the diverse, opinionated and variedly incentivised open source communities to agree on thinking as a unified "something" is like herding cats. But its high time that the desirability and existence of an "opt out" is recognized formally and that won't happen without large scale coherence.
Maybe even the notion "open source" is not longer helpful towards that end. Big tech has inflirtated and one way or another "sponsors" pretty much every major open source initiative.
The starting point is data sovereignty and privacy, but more fundamentally, what we need is agency in the use of information technologies.
- perilunar 3y ago“Digital Autarchy” perhaps?
- yakshaving_jgt 3y agoEven as a native speaker, “autarchy” is difficult to pronounce in an intelligible manner. And even if I do sufficiently contort my facial muscles to pronounce that word, it’s esoteric even for the nerdiest of audiences. It’ll never fly.
- rnaarten 3y ago[dead]
- mtsolitary 3y agoDigital sovereignty
- rationalist 3y agoMight be caught-up woth the negative perception of "sovereign citizens".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- x1xx 3y agopersonal (as opposed to corporate) computing