> In any instance where we do not win the ultimate chess match of human existence and make slaves out of AI You're applying human centric concepts but AI is no

> In any instance where we do not win the ultimate chess match of human existence and make slaves out of AI You're applying human centric concepts but AI is not like a person, it is more like an evolving culture. It is language evolution. AI models ingest the whole culture, and with each base model we have a whole generation of agents. What matters for AI is to create the playground where ideas can be tested and evolved. It might include computers, labs, humans and AIs. Testing is essential because ideas that don't make contact with reality are fragile. Humans are the pinnacle of testing with our long history of survival. AI is a newborn, it does not have years under its belt. It needs to learn fast how to keep the thread unbroken. Humans have had a few close calls, I hope AI will be more level headed.