7 ms·
But Germans didn’t even have the naval to capacity to successfully execute a mostly uncontested landing unless there was perfect weather.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
But Germans didn’t even have the naval to capacity to successfully execute a mostly uncontested landing unless there was perfect weather.
- ggm 3y agoEric Hobsbawm notoriously said counterfactual history is shit but that said, who knows what a demoralised British government might have done with a successful German landing even if small.
- kjkjadksj 3y agoSuppose the germans just forced the local french fisherman at gunpoint to take them over. Would the royal navy lay waste to thousands of french fisherman in the same seas as thousands of british fisherman loaded with their soldiers? I’m surprised the germans also didn’t just lay waste to them at dunkirk with indirect fire.
- ffgjgf1 3y ago> fisherman in the same seas as thousands of british fisherman loaded with their soldiers? Logistically it was impossible to launch an invasion at the same time as the Dunkirk evacuations were happening. Even if they manage to get to England on a few fishing boats what would they do there? > Would the royal navy lay waste to thousands of french fisherman The British didn’t have that many qualms about blowing up a significant part of the French navy as a mere precaution. So yes. That not how successful naval invasion work though anyway. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-Kébir https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-Kébir