>What do you do when incompetence would be unbelievable in scope and malice would be unbelievably incompetent. Given that incompetence is more harmful than mal

>What do you do when incompetence would be unbelievable in scope and malice would be unbelievably incompetent. Given that incompetence is more harmful than malice, you stay pessimistic, and still blame incompetence. Simply because, if you're pessimistic, the worst that can happen tells you that you were right. A malicious but competent person will cause damage to a few, when it's desirable for him. While an incompetent but non-malicious person will cause damage to everyone, including himself, at random intervals, regardless of his own desires. ________________ On-topic. I think that Reddit is trying to capitalise on business customers, using its platform to train its AI models with. If that's correct, then even if the users reacting negatively leave, and this puts a dent on Reddit's profit, Reddit will still profit more from those business customers.