4 ms·

But it wasn't dishonesty it was total obliviousness, maybe negligence.

• mtrpcic 3y ago
  A negligent civil engineer that failed to verify construction details provided by GPT, which later led to a bridge collapse, would lose their license. A negligent doctor that failed to vet a treatment protocol to a patient that later caused them harm would lose their license. Negligence is a fair, reasonable, and valid reason for someone to be determined unqualified to practice their profession in the future.
  • CPLX 3y ago
    > A negligent doctor that failed to vet a treatment protocol to a patient that later caused them harm would lose their license No, they wouldn’t
• vkou 3y ago
  It crossed the line from stupidity into dishonesty when the judge asked him "Wtf is this court case that you're citing", and the lawyer sent the judge a fabricated document. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368.29.1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57... How can anyone trust anything a lawyer does, when they are willing to fabricate documents, in order to continue to lie to a judge? This is Better Call Saul-level chicanery. He could have fessed up and apologized when called out on it, but he doubled down.