It's frustrating when people take scientific inquiry and dispassionate plausible explanation of historical circumstances as some sort of identity politics cudge

It's frustrating when people take scientific inquiry and dispassionate plausible explanation of historical circumstances as some sort of identity politics cudgel to bash a scientist over the head with erroneous value judgements like they're canceling a Neonazi. GGS was a good book. Independently, 2 MDs at my gym also came up and mentioned they thought it was a fascinating work. And my dept chair also thought it was a insightful work. In fairness, the last 1/3 of it kind of falls flat. Collapse isn't all that engaging.