4 ms·
> Why not blame your laptop manufacturer for creating the hardware you used to file your fraudulent court documents? Because your laptop manufacturer doesnt cl
by gumballindie 3y ago
> Why not blame your laptop manufacturer for creating the hardware you used to file your fraudulent court documents?
Because your laptop manufacturer doesnt claim your laptop “thinks”, is “intelligent”, doesnt build an entire fud marketing campaign around the two, doesnt claim it “creates” ideas on its own, doesnt claim it “learns like a human”, doesnt claim it has cognitive abilities and so on.
- LASR 3y agoCome on. We're dealing with qualified professionals here. The buck stops with them. A professional civil engineer blaming a new untested simulation software after a bridge fails and causes injury - does it matter what the software claimed to do? It could claim itself to be god, but it's still up to the professionals to evaluate and select the tools they choose to use. It's not like they were using an industry-standard tool they've been using for many years and it suddenly did something unexpected. This is clearly carelessness. A basic out-of-bound check on the cases it hallucinated would be part of basic due-diligence. Digitized case indices are available within minutes. What's even more egregious is that they went to the same tool to confirm its own reliability after they got some indication that it was unreliable. It doesn't take a professional to have commonsense.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> professional civil engineer blaming a new untested simulation software after a bridge fails and causes injury Which bridge failed and physically injured someone here?