4 ms·

What would be a good PR answer to refute the audio recording, out of curiosity?

• kemayo 3y ago
  Spitballing here, but for the interpreting-as-a-threat thing he could double-down on the misunderstanding claim -- it sounds like the CEO wasn't actually on that call, so he can throw an unnamed underling under the bus for how it was represented to him, and backpedal on the specific accusation while trying to still convey the vibe that he thinks Apollo was being unreasonable.
  • Exuma 3y ago
    Interesting, thanks. I see now what you mean about 'invalidating all statements' edit: maybe you are not OP, but I still see now.
• SahAssar 3y ago
  "While we do understand the concerns of individual developers we are moving forward with them as a community on these changes. As for mentions of acquisitions or valuations of future partnerships we consider those talks private and unfinished until we have something to announce" or some similar corporate bullshit. It's not an answer I would have liked, but it seems like it would have been far more in character.