5 ms·
Even if true it's unnecessary. I just can't read anything written by Wolfram without rolling my eyes
by stabbles 3y ago
Even if true it's unnecessary. I just can't read anything written by Wolfram without rolling my eyes
- Frost1x 3y agoOf course it's unnecessary, but I suspect there's at least some substance to this claim. If it were anyone else, a harmless plug like this would be accepted by most, might even be an interesting nugget a reader would appreciate. The issue is the style of claim (being the originator) is dropped far more than it should be. I'm personally a fan of many ideas Wolfram pushes, just not a fan of the style they're pushed. I'd say I'm not in the minority, to the point it's a tired cliche.
- nmstoker 3y agoLikewise. Especially when it's liberally sprinkled with his catch phrase: "A new kind of..." It's unfortunate as clearly he has a huge amount to contribute. Maybe with an LLM someone can build a de-Stepheniser that takes in his pompous, smug text and outputs something more mellow and reasonable whilst keeping all the facts, which is what we are there for after all.
- mnky9800n 3y agoThe only reasonable response
- bookofjoe 3y ago"Only the great are permitted great faults."—La Rochefoucauld