3 ms·
You're quite right, but paying the costs of synchronization at a hardware/C level rather than at a Java one defrays the cost of going out of process.
by hythloday 15y ago
You're quite right, but paying the costs of synchronization at a hardware/C level rather than at a Java one defrays the cost of going out of process.
- groby_b 15y agoJava synchronization is _that_ bad? (Not trolling - I just spend most of my days in C/C++). Any good performance studies you could point me to?