3 ms·
S3 stores 3 separate copies across 3 AZs so for that redundancy (at 400TiB), wouldn't you need more like 6x 14x16TB servers if you're making a direct comparison
by nijave 3y ago
S3 stores 3 separate copies across 3 AZs so for that redundancy (at 400TiB), wouldn't you need more like 6x 14x16TB servers if you're making a direct comparison?
- dinvlad 3y agoYes, for redundancy it could be useful, but doesn’t change the affordability materially.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]