3 ms·

> What I hate about airports and hospitals is that they now force you to relinquish total control over your own sphincters in order to be there; that, I think,

> What I hate about airports and hospitals is that they now force you to relinquish total control over your own sphincters in order to be there; that, I think, is why so many people die in hospitals. The loss of control. Well, no.

namaria 3y ago
What is correlation not, again?
- noduerme 3y ago
  Stop. Turn right. Take your shoes off. Accept this tube into your sphincter. Don't gag. Look into this camera. In speaking about having no control, I was actually just referring to the loss of bodily autonomy at TSA security checkpoints, not the danger of a plane crash. Also, to your specific question, while correlation between [1. sitting at a bar, smoking a cigarette, 2. imminent death] is low, and correlation between [1. hospital where you can't drink or smoke, 2. dying] is quite high, that was actually the humorous part of my critique. There just happens to be a weak correlation between people who are fervent readers of HN and those likely to get my sense of humor.
  - paulryanrogers 3y ago
    Humor often gets in the way of interesting discussion because of the ambiguity it introduces. Perhaps you can find another outlet for it, then bring your more serious thoughts here?
    - intelthrow6 3y ago
      Whippersnapper, at one point HN was full of jolly, good fun, and filled with cracks and quips. I quite like noduerme‘s writings, because it’s novel, raw, and most of all original. Pedantism for its own sake is not discussion — but noise. And most of all… he’s been here longer than you and still retains the original ethos of this platform (punk, create, disrupt — not curmudgeon, consume, and conform).
      - paulryanrogers 3y ago
        Name-calling, appeal to seniority, and nostalgic callbacks aren't deepening the conversation much; or likely to win anyone over. FWIW I do appreciate hearing from another perspective. And didn't think this was a forum encouraging punk, cracks, quips, and raw thoughts. Perhaps the commenting guidelines have become to 'square' as the kids say.
- zem 3y ago
  ham sandwiches
noduerme 3y ago
You may have missed the point in time where you could pass through an airport without being treated like you were being booked into jail. Or the time when you could go out on the street without being surveyed as if you were in prison. But there was, in fact, a long time where you were not forced to show ID or submit to random checks or be scoped eyeball to asshole by cameras. I suppose you're okay with that because you're "not doing anything wrong" but that sort of proves the point that they were so successful in creating a society willing to inculcate their children into believing that such an insane degree of degradation and voyeurism by the authorities was necessary to keep them "safe". They didn't win by convincing your parents, they won by convincing your parents to teach you that you should submit.

namaria 3y ago

What is correlation not, again?

noduerme 3y ago
Stop. Turn right. Take your shoes off. Accept this tube into your sphincter. Don't gag. Look into this camera. In speaking about having no control, I was actually just referring to the loss of bodily autonomy at TSA security checkpoints, not the danger of a plane crash. Also, to your specific question, while correlation between [1. sitting at a bar, smoking a cigarette, 2. imminent death] is low, and correlation between [1. hospital where you can't drink or smoke, 2. dying] is quite high, that was actually the humorous part of my critique. There just happens to be a weak correlation between people who are fervent readers of HN and those likely to get my sense of humor.
- paulryanrogers 3y ago
  Humor often gets in the way of interesting discussion because of the ambiguity it introduces. Perhaps you can find another outlet for it, then bring your more serious thoughts here?
  - intelthrow6 3y ago
    Whippersnapper, at one point HN was full of jolly, good fun, and filled with cracks and quips. I quite like noduerme‘s writings, because it’s novel, raw, and most of all original. Pedantism for its own sake is not discussion — but noise. And most of all… he’s been here longer than you and still retains the original ethos of this platform (punk, create, disrupt — not curmudgeon, consume, and conform).
    - paulryanrogers 3y ago
      Name-calling, appeal to seniority, and nostalgic callbacks aren't deepening the conversation much; or likely to win anyone over. FWIW I do appreciate hearing from another perspective. And didn't think this was a forum encouraging punk, cracks, quips, and raw thoughts. Perhaps the commenting guidelines have become to 'square' as the kids say.
zem 3y ago
ham sandwiches

noduerme 3y ago

You may have missed the point in time where you could pass through an airport without being treated like you were being booked into jail. Or the time when you could go out on the street without being surveyed as if you were in prison. But there was, in fact, a long time where you were not forced to show ID or submit to random checks or be scoped eyeball to asshole by cameras. I suppose you're okay with that because you're "not doing anything wrong" but that sort of proves the point that they were so successful in creating a society willing to inculcate their children into believing that such an insane degree of degradation and voyeurism by the authorities was necessary to keep them "safe". They didn't win by convincing your parents, they won by convincing your parents to teach you that you should submit.