Debian unstable is, in my experience, slightly more stable than arch. I gave up on arch after it broke after a pacman -Suy (despite having looked for breaking c

Debian unstable is, in my experience, slightly more stable than arch. I gave up on arch after it broke after a pacman -Suy (despite having looked for breaking changes) one time too many. Now I run Ubuntu LTS with gnu Guix for most userland software.