4 ms·
Why do you think this is the case? The audio by the Apollo dev doesn't support this, and spez has not published anything that would prove there was a threat. Th
by Timon3 3y ago
Why do you think this is the case? The audio by the Apollo dev doesn't support this, and spez has not published anything that would prove there was a threat. The audio doesn't sound like what you're describing, it sounds like what the Apollo dev is describing.
- riku_iki 3y ago> The audio by the Apollo dev doesn't support this looks like we are in disagreement about this part.
- Timon3 3y agoI'll quote directly from the audio (https://christianselig.com/apollo-end/reddit-third-call-may-31-end.m4a https://christianselig.com/apollo-end/reddit-third-call-may-... starting around 2:18): > Apollo dev: How did you take that, sorry? Could you elaborate? > spez: Oh, like, cause you were like "hey, if you want this, if you want this to go away, like [unintelligeble]..." > Apollo dev: Oh, I said if you want Apollo to go quiet, like I would say it's quite loud in terms of its API use..." > spez: Oh, okay, got it. Got it, sorry. That's a complete misinterpretation on my part. I apologize immediately [...] Would you expect spez to still consider it a threat given both the literal content of what he says, and the tone it was said in? I see no way your interpretation makes sense.
- riku_iki 3y agoI read this very carefully several times, and there is context which you decided not to quote, what is your point? Update on your updated comment: > and the tone it was said in? I see no way your interpretation makes sense. Looks like we are again in disagreement about this.
- Timon3 3y agoCould you explicitly state the context you believe I decided not to quote? Timestamps are enough.
- riku_iki 3y agocontext was "joke" about $10m to go quiet.
- Timon3 3y agoSo the part that spez was talking about misunderstanding, which he apologized for? The context you think I didn't include is the thing that spez is explicitly saying he didn't understand correctly?
- riku_iki 3y ago> The context you think I didn't include is the thing that spez is explicitly saying he didn't understand correctly? sorry, this doesn't make sense to me.
- Timon3 3y agoI quoted spez apologizing for misunderstanding something. You're saying I left that something out as context. Considering spez acknowledged his misunderstanding and apologized, it seems a bit ridiculous to expect the something he apologized for to "override" his apology, doesn't it?
- riku_iki 3y ago> Considering spez acknowledged his misunderstanding and apologized, it seems a bit ridiculous I answered this already, it could be sugarcoating. Sorry, this discussion is low quality to my taste and I have no interest in continuing. Good bye.