2 ms·

I'm not sure the subjective is a candidate for the what/who I'm asking about, since the subjective, not being an object, cannot be in a state of either identifi

by sctb 3y ago

I'm not sure the subjective is a candidate for the what/who I'm asking about, since the subjective, not being an object, cannot be in a state of either identification or non-identification. Your second paragraph I don't fully parse.

dangitnotagain 3y ago
The subject is the instance of subjectivity, counter intuitively “objectivity” does not refer to an object, everything is an object to objectivity, the subject is the instance of the subjectivity. As for the rest, that of which they speak means more toward that we are one instance sub divided by barriers, yet there remains a continuity among us. It does not mean there are no distinct identities, or containers of individuals cohabitating this continuous experience of our lives. Rather there are so many. On top of all that, mostly we make up satisfying stories to make forgivable the crude details of our lives. Thinking about most things will only drive you crazy anyways. Such idle comprehension is a luxury of modernity. Is this philosophical extrapolation, or a crude and forced attempt at something profound for someone‘s investment? I cringe to their connection either way. Though a fascinating interest just the same.