4 ms·
> Similarly, Volokh suggested that OpenAI might not be shielded by ChatGPT disclaimers like the one in its terms of use. > "Ars Technica can’t immunize itself
by barbariangrunge 3y ago
> Similarly, Volokh suggested that OpenAI might not be shielded by ChatGPT disclaimers like the one in its terms of use.
> "Ars Technica can’t immunize itself from defamation liability by merely saying, on every post, 'this post may contain inaccurate information'—likewise with OpenAI," Volokh told Ars.
Besides the point of whether this is just or not,
Wait, is there actually a case where a corporation can be held liable for something? All those terms of use “agreements” that you can’t live without signing a thousand of, they don’t completely take away your rights?
- gizmo686 3y agoNotably Walters never agreed to anything with OpenAI. He had no relationship with OpenAI, so their terms of service are irrelevant here.