3 ms·
They should ask themselves why we should pay for lawyers at all if we can ask ChatGPT the same things and get answers of the same quality.
by mysterydip 3y ago
They should ask themselves why we should pay for lawyers at all if we can ask ChatGPT the same things and get answers of the same quality.
- singlow 3y agoSo there are some bad lawyers therefore all lawyers are useless?
- mysterydip 3y agoNo, I'm saying if they think that it's to blame for wrong info and not themselves, then why should anyone pay for a lawyer instead of asking ChatGPT on their own?
- rank0 3y agoThese dudes are getting in trouble specifically for the shit answers spat out of chatGPT. Or yeah you could just yolo your freedom away and represent yourself using a mathematical expression with zero motivations, perception, or emotion.
- mysterydip 3y agoYou missed what I was saying (or I communicated it poorly). I'm not suggesting people use ChatGPT for their lawyer. They're saying it's ChatGPT's fault that they provided wrong info. If they provide no value (no liability for the service provided, and no filtering/vetting of ChatGPT answers from their lawyer expertise), then why would people pay their fee?
- rank0 3y agoOh I see. Yeah 100% agree the people in the article are garbage lawyers.
- dylan604 3y agoFrom the sounds of the quality of ChatGPT's legal skills, you might be better off representing yourself.