3 ms·
I dunno... This sounds like making diffusion backwards compatible with ESRGAN. Technically they are both upscaling denoisers (with finetunes for specific tasks
by brucethemoose2 3y ago
I dunno...
This sounds like making diffusion backwards compatible with ESRGAN. Technically they are both upscaling denoisers (with finetunes for specific tasks), and you can set up objective tests compatible with both, but actual way they are used is so different that its not even a good performance measurement.
The same thing applies to recent LLMs, and the structural changes are only going to get more drastic and fundamental. For instance, what about LLMs with seperate instruction and data context? Or multimodal LLMs with multiple inputs/outputs? Or LLMs that finetune themselves during inference? That is just scratching the surface.
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> what about LLMs with seperate instruction and data context? Do such architectures exist? Isn't this separation impossible, for fundamental reasons?
- sebzim4500 3y agoThere's loads of ways you could do this. e.g. cross attention, completely separate tokens for prompt and data, arguably special tokens to surround system prompts (GPT-4 api does this)