3 ms·
If I wanted to know what Bard or ChatGPT had to say about this, I would ask them.
by throwway120385 3y ago
If I wanted to know what Bard or ChatGPT had to say about this, I would ask them.
- westurner 3y agoBut you don't know to ask: that's the problem; They're all trying new QG and dark energy correction factors. One can't solve 3-body problems without Superfluid Quantum Gravity, thus this that I took the time to add is very relevant. Not worth helping then.
- westurner 3y agoGiven such an anti- AI-with-citation policy, researchers preparing comment content with citations for the platform have a counterproductive incentive to parallel construct after using e.g. search engines that use AI (Google, Bing,), and also an incentive to not cite their sources?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- westurner 3y ago> One can't solve 3-body problems without Superfluid Quantum Gravity The article (from 1962) does not predict 3-body accelerations of large masses or particles using current methods (probably because they had not yet been developed at the time). (Ironically, in context to the rejection of AI methods to summarize superfluid Quantum Gravity for the thread's benefit (and not my own),) N-body gravity problems are probably best solved by AI methods; it is well understood that there are no known closed-form solutions for n-body gravity problems. Three body problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem