> In the meantime, you can and should use Rust. In spite of any shortcomings it's still the best language that has come so far in terms of enforcing memory acce

> In the meantime, you can and should use Rust. In spite of any shortcomings it's still the best language that has come so far in terms of enforcing memory access safety and overall correctness 1. I don't think programming languages can "enforce correctness". (Although I will say that my general experience is that functional languages, not Rust, tend make it more difficult to get things trivially incorrect.) 2. I'm not sure that's a good enough reason to use Rust. I mean, sure, Rust is usable, people do things with it, but - my biased experience is that at some point you just go C++ for some reason, and stay there.