4 ms·
Oh no, it definitely can and should. There’s absolutely no excuse for not adding a sensor or even a dumb counter to implement a simple action limiter and constr
by eecc 3y ago
Oh no, it definitely can and should. There’s absolutely no excuse for not adding a sensor or even a dumb counter to implement a simple action limiter and constrain operation with a safe envelope. It’s basic engineering
- drewmol 3y agoEven if the designers valued tamper-resistance and/or direct control of the device over broad durability and/or protection against intentional vandalism? It seems burn out after being switched on and off repeatedly under load may be an acceptable failure mode in this type of device.