3 ms·
I fully agree, and to go one step "further" in that reasonning, there seems to be two ways on that street: one is the massive headset, which is a pain and whose
by nolok 3y ago
I fully agree, and to go one step "further" in that reasonning, there seems to be two ways on that street: one is the massive headset, which is a pain and whose only viable purpose for which people will accept wearing it seem to be gaming, and the other is the invisible headset in the continuation of google glass, which is less of a headset and more of a small addition to your everyday life.
I'm very weirded out to see all of them go with the massive option. A google glass oriented solution with 2023 level of tech and that can be adapted to any/most pair of glasses but offering much more limited functions (pictures/photo, maps/gps, notification, light AR, ...) would have much more appeal to every day life.
Not saying it's easy, not saying it would work, but it feels like it would be an easier challenge to convince people to wear that all the time.
- macrolime 3y agoIf we're to believe this, Apple is working on it but thinks it will be four years at minimum before it's good enough to be usable https://www.tomsguide.com/news/apple-glasses https://www.tomsguide.com/news/apple-glasses