43 ms·
I ran arch for a little while and really did not like it. Of the ~10 distros I’ve used over the years, Arch was by far the least stable. Turns out I don’t want
by medler 3y ago
I ran arch for a little while and really did not like it. Of the ~10 distros I’ve used over the years, Arch was by far the least stable. Turns out I don’t want to be the alpha tester for every piece of software on my machine.
A distro like Manjaro that delays package updates for a few weeks seems preferable for me.
- constantcrying 3y ago>A distro like Manjaro that delays package updates for a few weeks seems preferable for me. It is actually worse, especially if you are using AUR packages. But to be honest Arch has been extremely stable for me.
- medler 3y agoInteresting, could you explain more?
- whimsicalism 3y agoArch was definitely a less enjoyable experience for me than Redhat derived distros for similar reasons, but might just be my preference.
- goingtosleep 3y agoPeople say Arch is stable. Yes, it's stable until some nasty unexpected thing like the grub issue happens. Even though I'm willing to fix issues, I don't want to fix things accidentally when I need my PC to work.