4 ms·

"Oppressing" seems a bit much here. That's great that you prefer working from home, but if the people paying your salary don't share you view on this matter, i

• jleyank 3y ago
  Was thinking more of people stating that the job parameters were unilaterally changed on the fly. Hired for remote work, sorry, that's been changed, etc. Yeah, it's at will employment, but not everybody likes employment agreements being changed without their input. Sorry if it seemed flippant but it seemed to convey in a few words what I just wrote in a paragraph. I always viewed "negative job actions" with a jaundiced eye, and started a job search. And I fully believe that getting people to leave is the intent.
• flangola7 3y ago
  Oppression means more than just jackbooted thugs kicking in your door, you know. American companies do stuff to workers daily that would result in them being dissolved and their executives fined into bankruptcy or even jailed here.
• JamesLeonis 3y ago
  The purchaser of work maintains his right as a purchaser to insist working from an office. The seller of work maintains his right as a seller to insist working from home. Between equal rights, Force decides.
  • s1artibartfast 3y ago
    Not force but power Leverage and need. Nobody's going to come to your house and drag you into the office. They will however stop paying you. Because you can't force farmer to give you food, you will eventually end up back at the negotiating table and back in the office
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]