3 ms·
I'm curious if you've considered that there is a pretty major cost difference between the two options? (at least for the company) Would you conclude that In Per
by maerF0x0 3y ago
I'm curious if you've considered that there is a pretty major cost difference between the two options? (at least for the company) Would you conclude that In Person is much better , in excess of the additional costs ?
- karmasimida 3y agoThis doesn't make OP's point invalid. If you are talking about cost, then the only factor here is the market.
- maerF0x0 3y ago>If you are talking about cost, then the only factor here is the market. Can you please expand? I'm not understanding.
- pjc50 3y agoWeirdly, companies don't seem to care about this kind of cost. I don't think I've ever seen "we're going remote first to save costs"? More likely is the "prestige HQ" which is deliberately made more expensive than it needs to be for status.
- twic 3y agoThat's the trend in commercial real estate - prestigious, luxurious, eye-wateringly expensive class A space is doing well, but the bottom has fallen out of the market for practical, cost-effective class B space: https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2023/06/05/jeff-blau-to-class-b-office-owners-take-what-you-can-and-run/ https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2023/06/05/jeff-blau-to-cla...
- marcinzm 3y agoThe cost difference is probably rather small. CoWorking spaces in large cities charge something like $500/desk/month which we can assume is a reasonable cost of office space. That comes out to $6k/year/employee. Google's median employee pay is around $300k so we're talking a 2% difference in cost.